Skip to main content
Contribute to enhancing the Electricity ATB! Share your feedback in this 5-minute questionnaire, or signup for general email updates regarding the ATB.
The 2024 Electricity ATB is live! Join the webinar to learn what's new. Register to attend or sign up for general email updates.

Synthetic Aviation Fuel Assumptions

There are multiple meanings of the term “SAF,” or synthetic aviation fuel. Specific U.S. and international definitions are provided here because commercial aviation is a global business. We also identify the role of biomass sources and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets in the SAF definition, including the additional criteria that must be met to make the U.S. definition consistent with the international definition.

Although some may consider SAF to refer to pathways derived only from oils, in this definition, SAF refers to drop-in hydrocarbon jet fuel from a variety of pathways. Despite this definition, there are pathway-dependent blend ratios—and a 50% by volume maximum—that limit the amount of SAF that may be mixed into jet fuel.

Further defining SAF in a U.S. context, the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative (CAAFI) defines SAF as Jet A fuel blendstock that:

  1. Reduces net life-cycle CO2 emissions from aviation operations
  2. Enhances the sustainability of aviation by offering advantages to petroleum-based jet fuel in economic, social, and environmental aspects
  3. Enables drop-in jet fuel production from multiple feedstocks and conversion processes, so no changes are required in aircraft or engine fuel systems, distribution infrastructure, or storage facilities. As such, SAF can be mixed interchangeably (i.e., is fungible) with existing jet fuel. (Quoted from CAAFI Frequently Asked Questions.)

Internationally, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) establishes criteria for eligibility for credits under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA): 

  • Greenhouse Gas Criterion 1: CORSIA eligible fuel shall achieve net GHG emissions reductions of at least 10% compared to the baseline life-cycle emissions values for aviation fuel on a life-cycle basis.
  • Carbon Stock Criterion 1: CORSIA eligible fuel shall not be made from biomass obtained from land converted after January 1, 2008, that was primary forest, wetlands, or peat lands and/or contributes to degradation of the carbon stock in primary forests, wetlands, or peat lands because these lands all have high carbon stocks. 
  • Carbon Stock Criterion 2: In the event of land use conversion after January 1, 2008, as defined based on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) land categories, direct land use change (DLUC) emissions shall be calculated. If DLUC GHG emissions exceed the default induced land use change (ILUC) value, the DLUC value shall replace the default ILUC value. (Quoted from (ICAO, 2019).)

The SAF pathways presented in the Annual Technology Baseline (ATB) could meet the CAAFI definition as well as the ICAO CORSIA greenhouse gas criterion of 10% GHG reduction, depending on their actual life-cycle emissions. (The CAAFI definition does not state a specific target for GHG reduction relative to Jet A.) If biofuels in the United States will be derived from biomass resources identified in the 2023 Billion-Ton Report (U.S. Department of Energy, 2023), this would not include resources from old-growth forestland, consistent with part of ICAO CORSIA carbon stock eligibility Criterion 1. If the other ICAO criteria are satisfied, the SAF pathways shown in the ATB would be compliant both domestically and globally.

References

The following references are specific to this page; for all references in this ATB, see References.

U.S. Department of Energy, M.H. Langholtz (Lead). “2023 Billion-Ton Report: An Assessment of U.S. Renewable Carbon Resources.” Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2023. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/beto-2023-billion-ton-report_2.pdf.

Section
Issue Type
Problem Text
Suggestion